From da07a8ba8fa4f0053cd0752e0107588020f32710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 22:06:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add theprimeagen twt --- src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md index 907052c..7190226 100644 --- a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md +++ b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ pubDate: '25 Aug 2024' as llms get better and better at writing code, more and more people, at least on twt, have started to incorporate llms into their workflow. most people seem to agree that llms have been a game changer for coding, praising them for how much they have improved their productivity, how much easier it is to write code, and claiming that programmers who refuse to use them are "not using them correctly" and will eventually get left behind in my opinion, the effectiveness of llms in coding at their current state is vastly overblown. even if llms were as good as what avid users of them claim, i still won't see myself using it in any meaningful capacity. +

pic.twitter.com/Mq8CIQiS9A

— ThePrimeagen (@ThePrimeagen) August 25, 2024
+ ## the art of programming programming can be broken down into two parts - solving problems algorithmically, breaking problems into steps that computers can follow within some contraints, thus forming a solution to the original problem; and expressing the solution in a way that the computer can understand.