From 8205db685f2d55f513d3af2dd4401238cd57d75e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 02:23:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix slight typo --- src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md index a8628d0..6b0aa62 100644 --- a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md +++ b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ description: the art of programming and why i won't use llm pubDate: '25 Aug 2024' --- -as llms get better and better at writing code, more and more people, at least on twt, have started to incorporate llms into their workflow. most people seem to agree that llms have been a game changer for coding, praising how much they have improved their productivity, how much easier it is to write code, and that programmers who refuse to use them are "not using them correctly" and will eventually get left behind +as llms get better and better at writing code, more and more people, at least on twt, have started to incorporate llms into their workflow. most people seem to agree that llms have been a game changer for coding, praising them for how much they have improved their productivity, how much easier it is to write code, and that programmers who refuse to use them are "not using them correctly" and will eventually get left behind in my opinion, the effectiveness of llms in coding at their current state is vastly overblown. even if llms were as good as what avid users of them claim, i still won't see myself using it in any meaningful capacity. ## the art of programming