From 51b06bd1f3dda07d1681453da7ebeff3270426e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 02:24:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix grammar --- src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md index 6b0aa62..907052c 100644 --- a/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md +++ b/src/content/blog/why-i-still-wont-use-llm.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ description: the art of programming and why i won't use llm pubDate: '25 Aug 2024' --- -as llms get better and better at writing code, more and more people, at least on twt, have started to incorporate llms into their workflow. most people seem to agree that llms have been a game changer for coding, praising them for how much they have improved their productivity, how much easier it is to write code, and that programmers who refuse to use them are "not using them correctly" and will eventually get left behind +as llms get better and better at writing code, more and more people, at least on twt, have started to incorporate llms into their workflow. most people seem to agree that llms have been a game changer for coding, praising them for how much they have improved their productivity, how much easier it is to write code, and claiming that programmers who refuse to use them are "not using them correctly" and will eventually get left behind in my opinion, the effectiveness of llms in coding at their current state is vastly overblown. even if llms were as good as what avid users of them claim, i still won't see myself using it in any meaningful capacity. ## the art of programming